This technology could make automotive transportation so cheap and easy that people decide to make more trips by car, increasing congestion and undermining public transportation. Robotaxis also have huge immediate-term implications for transportation policy. It’s a very real possibility in the near future. The prospect of automating professional drivers out of existence is not theoretical anymore. The same goes for every other city where Cruise and Waymo set up shop. That could immediately have a considerable economic impact on the city’s taxi and ride-hail drivers. This is enough to warrant a broader discussion of how they will change cities and society.Ĭruise and Waymo are close to being authorized to provide all-day commercial robotaxi service throughout virtually all of San Francisco. It remains to be seen whether robotaxis are ready for deployment on a significant scale, or what the metric for determining readiness would even be.But barring a significant shift in momentum, like an economic shock, a horrific tragedy, or a dramatic political pivot, robotaxis are positioned to continue their roll. The mere fact that these vehicles are programmed to follow traffic laws and the speed limit automatically makes them feel like safer drivers than a large percentage of humans on the road. While not perfect, my most recent Cruise ride, in April, was sufficiently close to the experience of riding with a responsible human driver that I momentarily forgot I was in a robotaxi. Cruise, on the other hand, claims that its robotaxis experienced 53% fewer collisions than the typical human ride-hail driver in San Francisco in their first million driverless miles, and 73% fewer collisions with a meaningful risk of injury. The company cautions against direct comparisons with human drivers because there are rarely analogous data sets. In a paper on its first million “rider-only” miles, Waymo had two police-reportable crashes (with no injuries) and 18 minor contact events, about half of which involved a human driver hitting a stationary Waymo. Unfortunately, there is no standard, government-approved framework for evaluating the safety of autonomous vehicles. They can be unleashed within a strictly limited area where they’re well trained their use can be closely monitored by the company that designed them and they can immediately be pulled off the road in bad weather or if there’s another issue. Robotaxis are operationally quite different from personally owned autonomous vehicles, and they are in a much better position for commercial deployment. Over the past few years, Cruise and Waymo have cleared several major regulatory hurdles, expanded into new markets, and racked up over a million relatively uneventful, truly driverless miles each in major American cities. ![]() These critical stories, though important, obscure the general trend, which has been moving steadily in the robotaxi industry’s favor. San Francisco officials have documented at least 92 such incidents in just six months, including three that disrupted emergency responders. Cruise’s driverless vehicles, in particular, have shown an alarming tendency to inexplicably stop in the middle of the road, blocking traffic for extended periods of time. Journalists (myself included) have highlighted strange robo-behavior, concerning software failures, and Cruise and Waymo’s lack of transparency about their data. Media coverage of robotaxis has been rightfully skeptical. I upload the project for furthur reference.Unfortunately, there is no standard, government-approved framework for evaluating the safety of autonomous vehicles. There is no need to know the flow of program.It gets 256Īrray of type bool and combine them to DWORDs in order. To some DWORD parameters.Function is in SCL but ![]() You need a function to combine all arrays automatically Temp := SHL(IN:=BYTE#1,N:=BYTE_TO_INT(line)) Īdded exit statement in for loop instead of i:=5 IF NOT release AND BYTE_TO_INT(CODE) < 127 THEN (* check if release codes need to be killed *) (* scan line information has changed code need to be found and generated *) the output byte holds the 5 columns in the lowest bits 0.2 and the row number in bits 4.6, while bit 7 is true for a key pressed and false for a key released. the setup variable release is false the code is only sent when the key is pressed. ![]() matrix can send a code while a key is pressed and it sends another code while a key is released when the setup variable 'release' is set to true. MATRIX is a matrix keyboard encoder for 4 rows and up to 5 columns. Here is a function from the OSCAT open source library showing the AT overlay in S7 SCL: SRCBLK will not accept a IN_OUT Variable for some reason. On a side note, I discovered why the SFC BLK MOVE is not working.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |